• Burg, W. van der (2016), ‘Law as a Second-Order Essentially Contested Concept’, Jurisprudence 2016 (DOI: 10.1080/20403313.2016.1189156), 1-26.
  • Burg, W. van der (2016), ‘The Need for Audacious Fully Armed Legal Scholars: Concluding Reflections’, in: Sanne Taekema, Bart van Klink and Wouter de Been (eds.), Facts and Norms in Law. Interdisciplinary Reflections on Legal Method, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 265-286. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2783302
  • Burg, W. van der (2016), ‘The Emerging Interactionist Paradigm and the Ideals of Democracy and Rule of Law’, in: Bart van Klink, Britta van Beers & Lonneke Poort (eds.), Symbolic Legislation Theory and Developments in Biolaw, Dordrecht: Springer (Legisprudence Library), 37-53 http://ssrn.com/abstract=2589808
  • Taekema, H.S. & Burg, W. van der (2015 a and b), ‘Introduction: The Incorporation Problem in Interdisciplinary Legal Research Part 1: Theoretical Discussions,  Erasmus Law Review, 8 (2), 39-42. doi: 10.5553/ELR.000050 and ‘The Incorporation Problem in Interdisciplinary Legal Research, Part 2: Case Studies’, Erasmus Law Review, 8 (3), 79-80. doi: 10.5553/ELR.000056.
  • Burg, W. van der (2014), ‘The Work of Lon Fuller: A Promising Direction for Jurisprudence in the 21st Century’, University of Toronto Law Journal, 2014, 15 pp. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2264020
  • Pierik, R. and W. van der Burg (2014), ‘What Is Neutrality?’, Ratio Juris, 20 pp. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1917392
  • Taekema, S. and W. van der Burg, ‘Towards a Fruitful Cooperation between Legal Philosophy, Legal Sociology and Doctrinal Research: How Legal Interactionism May Bridge Unproductive Oppositions’, in: R. Nobles and D. Schiff (eds.) Law, Society and Community. Socio-Legal Essays in Honour of Roger Cotterrell, Farnham: Ashgate 2014, 129-145. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2503902
  • Burg, W. van der (2014), ‘Lon. L. Fuller’dan Yasa Koyuculara Dersler’ [‘Fuller’s Lessons for Legislators’], Hukuk Kurami C. 1, S. 3, Mayis Haziran 2014, 58-64. http://www.hukukkurami.net/2014/06/30/lon-l-fullerdan-yasa-koyuculara-dersler/ 
  • Burg, W. van der (2011), ‘Inclusive Neutrality in the Classroom’,Yearbook of the European Association for Education Law and Policy 2011. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1907594
  • Burg, W. van der (2012), ‘Slippery Slope Arguments’, in: R. Chadwick (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, San Diego etc.: Academic Press, 129-142 (revised, second edition). http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=1445308
  • R. Pierik and W. van der Burg (2011), ‘ The Neutral State and the Mandatory Crucifix’, in: Religion and Human Rights, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2011-6, 267-272
  • Burg, W. van der (2011), ‘‘Law and Ethics. The Twin Disciplines’’, in: Bart van Klink and Sanne Taekema (eds.), Law and Method, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2011, 175-194. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1631720
  • Burg, W. van der (2010), ‘The Regulation of Professionals. Two Conflicting Perspectives’, in: Thijs Jansen, Gabriel van den Brink and Jos Kole (eds.), Professional Pride. A Powerful Force, Amsterdam: Boom 2010, 155-174. (reprint with minor revisions from Legisprudence 2009) http://ssrn.com/abstract=1456422
  • Burg, W. van der (2009), ‘Essentially Ambiguous Concepts and the Fuller-Hart-Dworkin Debate’. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1009179
  • Burg, W. van der (2009), ‘Law and Bioethics’, in: P. Singer and H. Kuhse (eds.), A Companion to Bioethics, Oxford: Blackwell, 15 pp. (revised, second edition). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1447276
  • Burg, W. van der (2009), ‘Developing a Liberal Protestant Ethics in a Dynamic and Pluralist World’, in: V. Küster (ed,), Reshaping Protestantism in a Global Context, Münster: LIT, 145-153 (abbreviated version of French article 205) http://ssrn.com/abstract=1457713
  • Burg, W. van der and S. Taekema (2005), ‘Ideals in Law’, IVR Encyclopedia of Legal Theory. http://encyclopedia.ivr2003.net.
  • Burg, W. van der (2005), ‘Pour une éthique protestante libérale dans un monde changeant et pluriel’, Revue de Theologie et de Philosophie, 137 (2005), 193-209
  • Burg, W. van der (2005), ‘The irony of a symbolic crusade; The debate on opening up civil marriage to samesex couples’, in: N. Zeegers, W. Witteveen and B. van Klink (eds.) Social and Symbolic Effects of Legislation Under the Rule of Law, Lewiston: Edwin Mellen, Press 2005, 245-275 http://ssrn.com/abstract=1463317
  • Burg W. van der, (2004), ‘The Role of Ideals in Legal Dynamics’, in: Arend Soeteman (ed), Pluralism and Law, Proceedings of the 20th IVR World Congress, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie Beiheft 91, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner 2004, pp. 28-33.
  • Burg W. van der, and S. Taekema (2004), ‘Motivation by Ideal. In discussion with J.David Velleman”, Philosophical Explorations 7 (2004) 1, 91-98.
  • Burg W. van der, . and S. Taekema, ‘Introduction’, in: Van der Burg, W. and S. Taekema (eds.), The Importance of Ideals: Debating Their Relevance in Law, Morality, and Politics, Bruxelles, etc.: Peter Lang 2004, 11-38.
  • Burg W. van der, ‘An Interactionist View on the Relation between Law and Morality’, in: Van der Burg, W. and S. Taekema (eds.), The Importance of Ideals: Debating Their Relevance in Law, Morality, and Politics, Peter Lang 2003.
  • Burg, W. van der (2003), ‘Dynamic Ethics’, Journal of Value Inquiry 37 (2003), 12-34.
  • Burg, W. van der (2003), ‘The WTO and Public Morals: Inspiration from the ECHR’, in: Anton Vedder (ed.), The WTO and Concerns Regarding Animals and Nature, Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers 2003, p. 101-127
  • Burg, W. van der (2001), ‘The Expressive and the Communicative Functions of Law’, Law and Philosophy, 20(2001)1, 31-59. Burg, W. van der (2000), ‘Reflective equilibrium as a dynamic process’, in: B. Petersson (ed.), Applied ethics and reflective equilibrium, (Studies in Applied Ethics 8 ) Linköping: Centre for Applied Ethics, 69-92.
  • Burg, W. van der, and F.W.A. Brom (2000), ‘Legislation on Ethical Issues: Towards an Interactive Paradigm’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 3(2000)1, 57-75.
  • Burg, W. van der (1999), ‘The Morality of Aspiration: A Neglected Dimension of Law and Morality’, in: W.J. Witteveen and W. van der Burg (Eds.), Rediscovering Fuller. Essays on Implicit Law and Institutional Design, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 169-192. http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=1462655
  • Burg, W. van der (1999), ‘Two Models of Law and Morality’, Associations 3(1999)1, 61-82.
    (translated in German as: ‘Zwei Modelle von Recht und Moral’, in: A. Bondolfi und S. Grotefeld (Hrsg.), Ethik und Gesetzgebung. Probleme – Lösungsversuche – Konzepte, Stuttgart, etc.: Kohlhammer 2000, 23-41. http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=1463283
  • Burg, W. van der and F.W.A. Brom (1999), ‘Eine Verteidigung der Staatlichen Neutralität’, in: K.P. Rippe (Hrsg.), Angewandte Ethik in der pluralistischen Gesellschaft, Freiburg, CH: Freiburger Universitätsverlag, 53-82.
  • Burg, W. van der (1999), ‘Legislation on Ethical Issues: Towards an Interactive Paradigm’, in: Ethik und Gezetzgebung: Societas Ethica Jahresbericht 1998, Zürich: Societas Ethica, 158-173.
  • Burg, W. van der (1998), ‘Law and Bioethics’, in: P. Singer and H. Kuhse (eds.), A Companion to Bioethics, Oxford: Blackwell, 49-57
  • Burg, W. van der (1998), ‘Ideals and Ideal Theory: The Problem of Methodological Conservatism’, in: W. van der Burg and T. van Willigenburg (eds.) (1998), Reflective Equilibrium. Essays in Honour of Robert Heeger, Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 89-99.
  • Burg, W. van der and T. van Willigenburg (1998), ‘Introduction’, in: W. van der Burg and T. van Willigenburg (eds.) (1998), Reflective Equilibrium. Essays in Honour of Robert Heeger, Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1-25.
  • Burg, W. van der (1998), ‘Beliefs, Persons and Practices: Beyond Tolerance’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1(1998)2, 227-254
  • Burg, W. van der (1998), ‘Slippery Slope Arguments’, in: R. Chadwick (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, San Diego etc.: Academic Press, 129-142. (reprinted in R. Chadwick (ed.) (2001), The Concise Encyclopedia of the Ethics of New Technologies, San Diego etc.: Academic Press, 384-395.
  • Burg, W. van der (1997), ‘The Importance of Ideals’, Journal of Value Inquiry, 31(1997), 23-37.
  • Burg, W. van der (1997), ‘Bioethics and Law: A Developmental Perspective’, Bioethics 11(1997)2, 91-114.
  • Burg, W. van der (1997), ‘From Ethics to Law’, in: L. Rydén (ed.) Foundations of Sustainable Development: Ethics, law, culture and the physical limits, Uppsala: The Baltic University, 27-31. (also in Russian, Polish, and Latvian translation)
  • Burg, W. van der (1996), ‘Legislation on human embryos: from status theories to value theories’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie (1996), 73-87.
  • Burg, W. van der (1995), ‘Reflections on Collective Rights and State Sovereignty’, in: T. van Willigenburg, F.R. Heeger en W. van der Burg (eds.) (1995), Nation, State and the Coexistence of Different Communities, Kampen: Kok Pharos, 221-246.
  • Burg, W. van der, P. Ippel, et al. (1994), ‘The care of a good caregiver. Legal and ethical reflections on the good health care professional’, Cambridge Quarterly of Health Care Ethics, 3(1994)1, 38-48.
  • Burg, W. van der (1993), ‘Critical Study of Douglas Walton, Slippery slope arguments’, Informal Logic, XV(1993)3, 221-229.
  • Burg, W. van der (1992), ‘Equality versus religious freedom’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 78(1992), 211-218.
  • Burg, W. van der (1991), ‘The slippery slope argument’, Ethics 102(1991), 42-65.
    (reprinted in The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 3(1992)4, 256-268.)
    (reprinted and abbreviated in: E.-H.W. Kluge (ed.), Readings in Biomedical Ethics. A Canadian focus, Scarborough, Ont.: Prentice Hall Allyn and Bacon Ontario, 383-400.)
  • Burg, W. van der (1990), ‘Jürgen Habermas on Law and Morality’, Theory, Culture, and Society, (1990), 105-111.;
  • Burg, W. van der (1990), ‘Equality versus religious freedom: the controversial proposal for a law against discrimination’, Societas Ethica Jahresbericht 1990, 102-104. (abstract);
  • Burg, W. van der (1989), ‘The Myth of Civil Disobedience’, Praxis International, (1989), 287-304.
    (translated and abbreviated as ‘Für einen neuen Ansatz in der Debatte über Zivilen Ungehorsam’, in: Wolf-Dieter Narr, Roland Roth & Klaus Vack (Hrsg.), Ziviler Ungehorsam. Traditionen, Konzepte, Erfahrungen, Perspektiven, Sensbachtal: Komitee für Grundrechte und Demokratie 1992, 57-76.